Equality between sexes?

Oh well. Some competitions are giving out equal prizes for both sexes, when it isn't in the past.

So, people have been asking if men and women can be treated equally.

Personally for me, yes, in some aspects. But no, in quite a few aspects as well.

Well, if women want equality, how about changing the law first? In many countries, the law protects the women. All that no sex below 16 years old, giving oral sex will mean that the guy gets a life jail term while the girl get away scot free.

So, if the women wants the world to be equal to them, how about getting rid of these laws?

Seriously, these laws were "made" to protect women. However, in the world today, I think we men need some protection as well. The law is seriously biased against us. A women can rape a man, but the penalty is much lower compared to that of a man. Sure, you can talk that the guy is "enjoying" the rape if he got an erection. Then again, there are ways to "obtain" an erection. It's just like a woman getting wet. There are ways to do it, if you know how ice cubes it the way to go~). Heck, even Patricia, my GP tutor last year, has said that (something along the lines of) "men are more sexually active then women, and hence they can rape women. More over, men are more stronger then women, and can easily overpower them"

Umm...

Welcome to 2005 (or 2004 last year...lol). There are women bodybuilders who can pick me up and snap me like a twig. Heck, that's not even it. With all sorts of gadgets a women has access to, tings like Stunners, Mace and all that, she can easily knock out a guy, tie him up (use cuffs...ooh), then do whatever she wants with him. So, is it only us guys who are strong now? And, as for the fact that "men are more sexually active", I don't know if I should even talk about that. Alright, maybe I should. Here's a question: Why are there so many damned toys for women in those sex shops? High speed Dildos, double headed Dildos. The list goes on. For men, the only thing we have is a sex doll. And that, don't come cheap. So, here we are, women with plenty of selection of sex toys, while we men only have 1 type.

Who's the sexually active one now?

Also, with the recent news, it is women who get into the spotlight for raping men. Not the other way round. Sure, there are probably men raping women, but the other way round? It just shows that women have the ability, and can, rape us.

Let's get rid of sex and talk about something else.

Like say, punishments. Women don't get caned in Singapore (IIRC...), while men get the lovely rattan for quite a few offenses. Like what Sunday Times said today, if it was a guy who tossed the dead baby down a chute, he could be charged for murder(death), or man-slaughter(life) at the very list, while the women can be charged with infantcide, which carries a jail term. The reason given is because "women will undergo stress" and that crap. Probably true, but is it true for all? And are you telling me that we men don't get such stress when we kill our own child?

Give me a break.

Back to sex, and if you are a women, and you want to get a man out of your way, the easiest way is to give him a blow-job. Then, blow it on him (no pun intended..), and see him go to jail for a while while you occupy his position at the office. Simple, isn't it? Yeah, sure, you will get all that bad name and stuff, but hey, it can happen. Heck, given in my position, I would go for "bad name and a $10k job", then a "life behind bars with free food and lodging". At least you have freedom. That's the lovely part of the law. Even if you screw around, you don't get charged. But a married men who screws around will get screwed, legally.

Interestingly, while gay sex is considered "unnatural sex", which can see you doing hard time, lesbian sex is not considered "unnatural sex". Funny, eh? The last time I checked, the meaning of the word "gay" is Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex. So, why isn't it considered "unnatural sex" as well? Heck, it's actually legal for a women to flash us. Sure, some guys will like it, but for me, I will probably run away screaming in horror.

And here's what everyone is talking about: If the women want equalty, they will have to do what we men are doing: NS. Sure, many girls have said that "We can do it! Bring it!" Then again, there are some girls I know which are afraid of the sun, some are afraid of the heat, and many more hate PE, and fail NAPFA. Sure, there are many who got Gold, but are women ready to undergo such training?

Perhaps not.

And here's another case: If the world is equal, is there such a thing as a "gentleman", and a "lady"? Must we guys always open car doors for the girls, open the doors for them, pull the chairfor them...blah blah blah. If it's equal, will girls do the same? Will they carry what we guys shop? Are they ready to handle it? If they want equality, the lines of being a "gentleman" and a "lady" must go. You can't have equality, and then ask for some allowances to be given. It would be violating the "equality" law. or example, 1+1 = 2. You can't go 1+1 = 3. The equal sign won't work then.

But of course, there are some things which I believe should be equal. For example, women should be allowed to drive, to drink and to have their own freedom. There are countries who don't even give these to their country's women. It's just wrong. Sure, the world isn't ready for equality of the sexes yet, but we can take things slowly. Yes, as women has always said, we men have been controlling the world for a long time. But then, why did women wait so long to rebel, in any case. Sure, according to GP once again, they don't know they can rebel. Wait a minute, women in 1660s and 1990s are the same ones right? Same build, a generally similar mind, yet why are they so different now? Did god decide to include common sense or add in some special intelligence to women in the late 1900s?

I think not.

Still, I belive that the world is not ready for equality. Women are simply not ready to make some sacrifices, as do men not being willing to give up what they control.
--

Public Groping, is that really a problem?

Man, I love Sunday Times...there's just so much rubbish to talk about...

Seriously, if you are irked people, look away. Duh. It's called "public". They can do what they like, and you can do it too.

But what's this big fuss? So far, the ones that I see are the old ones who think this is 1960s.

Dude, grow up!

The society is much more open now. Kissing each other on the lips isn't that bad now (although personally, I frown on it, but I don't exactly mind it). Yeah, you are irked, and there are many things which irk me, things like what's said on your shirt, and stuff.

So what am I supposed to do when I see something I don't like on your shirt? Cry?

No I don't. I just look away. It's just like those couples who do their stuff when they have 2 seconds to spare on the escalator. I just look away. I don't break down and cry and stuff.

As for movies, your eyes should be on the screen, and not on what the couple in front of you is doing. If they decide to hump each other, the most you can do is to ask for help if you really can't take it anymore because they can't do sex worth nuts. (Heck, just film it down and blackmail them or something. Baka...=D). Heck, holding hands and stuff are so yesteryear (the coolest word to use on the newspaper these days, for some reason. At least it isn't the phrase "it's so good, it's better than sex!" which appeared quite a few times a few years back...>_>). They don't mind people seeing them french kiss. The person who should be irked out should be THEM, and not YOU. They are doing it, and all you need to do is watch to get irked. LOOK AWAY, and they arn't there anymore! Simple!

People these days want to send the message "We love each other, and we are not afraid to show it". It's the new generation, and while that is somewhat true, I don't think it's "uncool to be not so open". Personally, I'm never a guy who likes being too open, although I don't mind it. There are things which I don't like, but at the same time, I don't mind it. Something like a neutral stand point. If my girlfriend wants me to kiss her in public, I don't mind doing it. She wants it, so I pretty much don't mind giving one. However, if she isn't asking, I won't do it, because I don't like it. Get it?

No?

Good.